Haier ESA410K 10000 BTU Air Conditioner

Haier ESA410K 10000 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 10.8 EER and a cooling capacity of 10,000 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Haier ESA410K 10000 BTU Air Conditioner uses moderately less cooling watts (11% less), and has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (6% more) on the other hand Haier ESA410K 10000 BTU Air Conditioner has much l

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Haier	vs	5.5% Air Conditioners have Haier	compare Haier Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	10.8 EER (0.63 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (10.8) EER
Cooling Capacity	10000 BTU/hr (9990 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (10,000) BTU/hr
Dehumidifier	With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	96% Air Conditioners have With Dehumidifier Functionality
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Additional Features	Programmable Timer
Description	The Haier Esa410k 10000 Btu Thru-wall/window Air Conditioner Has An Air Flow Of 270 Cfm (cubic Foot Per Meter). Haier Is A Manufacturer Of Major Appliances And Electronics With A Roster Of Products Including, But Not Limited To, Wine Cellars, Refrigerators And Freezers. Haier Is A Manufacturer Of Major Appliances And Electronics With A Roster Of Products Including, But Not Limited To, Wine Cellars, Refrigerators And Freezers.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	3 Pt/h (1.55 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (3) Pt/h
Air Flow	270 CFM (91.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (270) CFM
Swing Louvers	2-way
Filter	Reusable

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		920 (271.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (920)
Voltage		115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46

Dimensions
Width	19 in. (5.11 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	14.38 in. (92.59 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	18.13 in. (1.56 in. lower than average)	vs	19.69 in.