Fujitronic FA-1300 13000 BTU Air Conditioner

Fujitronic FA-1300 13000 BTU Air Conditioner is a Portable air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 11.3 EER and a cooling capacity of 13,000 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Fujitronic FA-1300 13000 BTU Air Conditioner has a much more cooling capacity (18% more), and moderately more energy efficiency rating (11% more) on the other hand Fujitronic FA-1300 13000 BTU Air Conditioner uses mo

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Fujitronic	vs	0.2% Air Conditioners have Fujitronic
Type	Portable			compare Portable Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	11.3 EER (1.13 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (11.3) EER
Cooling Capacity	13000 BTU/hr (12990 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (13,000) BTU/hr
Dehumidifier	With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	96% Air Conditioners have With Dehumidifier Functionality
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Description	The Dual Tube Technology On This Portable Air Conditioner From Fujitronic Provides More Efficient Cooling Than That Provided By Most Other Portable Air Conditioners. Rather Than Cooling Its Compressor With Already-cooled Air From The Room It Is In, This Portable Air Conditioner Cools Itself With Air Pulled From The Outside. As An Added Bonus, This Portable Air Conditioner Has Convertible Dual Tube Technology. If You Dont Want To Worry About Hooking Up Both Tubes, Just Hook Up The Exhaust - The Portable Air Conditioner Will Run A Bit Less Efficiently, But It Will Still Cool Just Fine!

Other Features
Moisture Removal		3.5 Pt/h (1.05 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (3.5) Pt/h
Cooling Operating Range		63 - 95 F

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	1150 (41.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (1150)
Voltage	120 (28.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity	10 (8.2 lower than average)	vs	18.20

Dimensions
Width	18.5 in. (5.61 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	34 in. (72.97 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	13.5 in. (6.19 in. lower than average)	vs	19.69 in.