Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	LG LP1311BXR 13000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Fujitronic FA-1300 13000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of LG LP1311BXR 13000 BTU Air Conditioner and Fujitronic FA-1300 13000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warranty

There are 14 differences and 10 similarities between LG LP1311BXR 13000 BTU Air Conditioner, Fujitronic FA-1300 13000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Lg	vs	Fujitronic
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Portable	vs	Portable
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		9.7 EER	vs	11.3 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		13,000 BTU/hr	vs	13,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier		With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	With Dehumidifier Functionality
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features		Programmable Timer · Temperature Increments	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		The Lg Lp1311bxr 13000 Btu Portable Air Conditioner Has An Air Flow Of 250 Cfm (cubic Foot Per Meter).	vs	The Dual Tube Technology On This Portable Air Conditioner From Fujitronic Provides More Efficient Cooling Than That Provided By Most Other Portable Air Conditioners. Rather Than Cooling Its Compressor With Already-cooled Air From The Room It Is In, This Portable Air Conditioner Cools Itself With Air Pulled From The Outside. As An Added Bonus, This Portable Air Conditioner Has Convertible Dual Tube Technology. If You Dont Want To Worry About Hooking Up Both Tubes, Just Hook Up The Exhaust - The Portable Air Conditioner Will Run A Bit Less Efficiently, But It Will Still Cool Just Fine!
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Not Compliant	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		3.2 Pt/h	vs	3.5 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		250 CFM	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers		2-way	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Reusable	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”
Cooling Operating Range			vs	63 - 95 F
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Operating Range”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts			vs	1150
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	120
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity			vs	10
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		18.5 in.	vs	18.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		32.94 in.	vs	34 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		15.44 in.	vs	13.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”