Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Whynter SNO ARC-13W 13000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Fujitronic FA-1300 13000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Whynter SNO ARC-13W 13000 BTU Air Conditioner and Fujitronic FA-1300 13000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, wa

There are 10 differences and 11 similarities between Whynter SNO ARC-13W 13000 BTU Air Conditioner, Fujitronic FA-1300 13000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Whynter	vs	Fujitronic
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Portable	vs	Portable
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		11.06 EER	vs	11.3 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		13,000 BTU/hr	vs	13,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier		With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	With Dehumidifier Functionality
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Description		These Portable Units Are Extremely Mobile And Can Be Easily Setup In Almost Any Indoor Location And Are Most Commonly Used In Computer / Server Rooms, Bedrooms, Classrooms And Garages / Workshops.	vs	The Dual Tube Technology On This Portable Air Conditioner From Fujitronic Provides More Efficient Cooling Than That Provided By Most Other Portable Air Conditioners. Rather Than Cooling Its Compressor With Already-cooled Air From The Room It Is In, This Portable Air Conditioner Cools Itself With Air Pulled From The Outside. As An Added Bonus, This Portable Air Conditioner Has Convertible Dual Tube Technology. If You Dont Want To Worry About Hooking Up Both Tubes, Just Hook Up The Exhaust - The Portable Air Conditioner Will Run A Bit Less Efficiently, But It Will Still Cool Just Fine!
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
Moisture Removal		1.79 Pt/h	vs	3.5 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		21 CFM	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Filter		Reusable	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”
Cooling Operating Range		From 64 F	vs	63 - 95 F
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Operating Range”
Heating Operating Range		Up To 86 F	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Heating Operating Range”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		1175	vs	1150
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	120
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		10.21	vs	10
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		20.5 in.	vs	18.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		19 in.	vs	34 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		21.7 in.	vs	13.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”