Frigidaire FRA062AT7 6000 BTU Air Conditioner

Frigidaire FRA062AT7 6000 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 9.7 EER and a cooling capacity of 6,000 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Frigidaire FRA062AT7 6000 BTU Air Conditioner uses far less cooling watts (40% less) on the other hand Frigidaire FRA062AT7 6000 BTU Air Conditioner has far less air flow (51% less), a far less cooling capacity (45%

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Frigidaire	vs	11.7% Air Conditioners have Frigidaire	compare Frigidaire Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	9.7 EER (0.47 EER lower than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (9.7) EER
Cooling Capacity	6000 BTU/hr (5990 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (6,000) BTU/hr
Dehumidifier	With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	96% Air Conditioners have With Dehumidifier Functionality
Remote Control	Without Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Description	Effortless Temperature Control: Our Air Conditioners Maintain The Preset Room Temperature, So You Will Remain Comfortable At All Times. Effortless Clean Filter: Our Anti-microbial Filter Cleans The Air, Removing Harmful Bacteria And Alergens. Quickly Cools: Quickly Cool A Room On Hot Days. Effortless Restart: Automatically Resume Operating At Its Previous Settings When Power Is Restored To Your Unit. Power Cord: Comes With An Extra Long Three-prong Cord - Makes Extension Cords Unecessary. Spacewise Adjustable Design: Optional Side Panels Extend So You Can Adjust Your Unit To Fit Your Window.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Not Compliant	vs	41% Air Conditioners have Not Compliant
Moisture Removal	1.3 Pt/h (3.25 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (1.3) Pt/h
Air Flow	176 CFM (185.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (176) CFM
Swing Louvers	8-way

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		620 (571.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (620)
Voltage		115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46

Dimensions
Width	18.5 in. (5.61 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	12.5 in. (94.47 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	15.5 in. (4.19 in. lower than average)	vs	19.69 in.