Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Frigidaire FRA062AT7 6000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner and Frigidaire FRA062AT7 6000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warrant

There are 11 differences and 11 similarities between Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner, Frigidaire FRA062AT7 6000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Sharp	vs	Frigidaire
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		10.7 EER	vs	9.7 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		6,000 BTU/hr	vs	6,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier			vs	With Dehumidifier Functionality
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	Without Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features		Single Zone · Programmable Timer	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		Energy Star Rated 6-000 Btu Window Air Conditioner With Remote- User Friendly Controls- Washable Filter- 4-way Air Direction And Many More Features.	vs	Effortless Temperature Control: Our Air Conditioners Maintain The Preset Room Temperature, So You Will Remain Comfortable At All Times. Effortless Clean Filter: Our Anti-microbial Filter Cleans The Air, Removing Harmful Bacteria And Alergens. Quickly Cools: Quickly Cool A Room On Hot Days. Effortless Restart: Automatically Resume Operating At Its Previous Settings When Power Is Restored To Your Unit. Power Cord: Comes With An Extra Long Three-prong Cord - Makes Extension Cords Unecessary. Spacewise Adjustable Design: Optional Side Panels Extend So You Can Adjust Your Unit To Fit Your Window.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Compliant	vs	Not Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		1.3 Pt/h	vs	1.3 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		176 CFM	vs	176 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers		4-way	vs	8-way
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Reusable	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		560	vs	620
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	115
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		5.5	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		18.5 in.	vs	18.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		12.5 in.	vs	12.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		16.3 in.	vs	15.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”