Frigidaire FRA086AT7 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Frigidaire FRA086AT7 8000 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 10.8 EER and a cooling capacity of 8,000 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Frigidaire FRA086AT7 8000 BTU Air Conditioner uses much less cooling watts (28% less), and has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (6% more) on the other hand Frigidaire FRA086AT7 8000 BTU Air Conditioner has

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Frigidaire	vs	11.7% Air Conditioners have Frigidaire	compare Frigidaire Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	10.8 EER (0.63 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (10.8) EER
Cooling Capacity	8000 BTU/hr (7990 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (8,000) BTU/hr
Dehumidifier	With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	96% Air Conditioners have With Dehumidifier Functionality
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Additional Features	Programmable Timer
Description	Frigidaire's Fra086at7 8, 000 Btu Mini Compact Window Air Conditioner Is Perfect For Medium To Large Size Rooms Up To 350 Square Feet. This Unit Features Electronic Controls And Full Function Remote Control With Remote Thermostat. The Antimicrobial Filter Reduces Bacteria, Room Odors, And Other Airborne Particles For A Comfortable Environment. And With Energy Star Efficiency, This Unit Provides Savings Along With Cool, Quiet Comfort.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	1.7 Pt/h (2.85 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (1.7) Pt/h
Air Flow	217 CFM (144.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (217) CFM
Swing Louvers	8-way

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		740 (451.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (740)
Voltage		115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46

Dimensions
Width	18.5 in. (5.61 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	13.4 in. (93.57 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	15.5 in. (4.19 in. lower than average)	vs	19.69 in.