Sharp AF-S80FX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Sharp AF-S80FX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 10.8 EER and a cooling capacity of 8,000 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Sharp AF-S80FX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (6% more) on the other hand Sharp AF-S80FX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner has far less air flow (57% less), and a much less cooling cap

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Sharp	vs	4.4% Air Conditioners have Sharp	compare Sharp Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	10.8 EER (0.63 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (10.8) EER
Cooling Capacity	8000 BTU/hr (7990 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (8,000) BTU/hr
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Description	Sharp's Expanded Line Of Energy Star1 Air Conditioners Provides Cool Comfort All Summer Long. Sharp's Air Conditioners Not Only Exceed Federal Efficiency Standards, They Exceed Design Standards As Well. Sleek And Stylish, They Will Fit Into Your Home Design Beautifully. Saving You Energy And Enhancing Your Decor, Sharp's Air Conditioner Line Is Too Cool To Pass Up.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	3 Pt/h (1.55 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (3) Pt/h
Air Flow	150 CFM (211.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (150) CFM
Swing Louvers	Up / Down · Left / Right
Filter	Reusable

Electrical Requirements
Voltage		115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity		15 (3.2 lower than average)	vs	18.20

Dimensions
Width	19.69 in. (4.42 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	14.44 in. (92.53 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	17.09 in. (2.6 in. lower than average)	vs	19.69 in.