Panasonic CW-XC84HU 7800 BTU Air Conditioner

Panasonic CW-XC84HU 7800 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 10.8 EER and a cooling capacity of 7,800 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Panasonic CW-XC84HU 7800 BTU Air Conditioner uses much less cooling watts (31% less), and has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (6% more) on the other hand Panasonic CW-XC84HU 7800 BTU Air Conditioner has fa

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Panasonic	vs	2.8% Air Conditioners have Panasonic	compare Panasonic Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	10.8 EER (0.63 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (10.8) EER
Cooling Capacity	7800 BTU/hr (7790 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (7,800) BTU/hr
Dehumidifier	With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	96% Air Conditioners have With Dehumidifier Functionality
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Description	Panasonics Room Air Conditioner Has A Compact Remote Control With 12-hour Delay On/off Setting Timer And Is Fitted With A Removable, Washable Intake Grille For Easy Care. 4-way Air Deflection System Allows For Wide Airflow With 3 Cooling Speeds And 3 Fan Speeds Along With An Auto Restart. The Air Conditioner Can Operate In Economy Operation Mode Or Dry Mode, Has A Ventilation Control And Has A Left Or Right Side Power Cord.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	2.3 Pt/h (2.25 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (2.3) Pt/h
Air Flow	212 CFM (149.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (212) CFM
Swing Louvers	Up / Down · Left / Right
Filter	Reusable
Cooling Operating Range	60 - 86 F

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	720 (471.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (720)
Voltage	155 (6.54 higher than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity	6.6 (11.6 lower than average)	vs	18.20

Dimensions
Width	18.47 in. (5.64 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	13.91 in. (93.06 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	20.66 in. (0.97 in. higher than average)	vs	19.69 in.