Panasonic CW-C53HU 5200 BTU Air Conditioner

Panasonic CW-C53HU 5200 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 10.8 EER and a cooling capacity of 5,200 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Panasonic CW-C53HU 5200 BTU Air Conditioner uses far less cooling watts (54% less), and has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (6% more) on the other hand Panasonic CW-C53HU 5200 BTU Air Conditioner has far l

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Panasonic	vs	2.8% Air Conditioners have Panasonic	compare Panasonic Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	10.8 EER (0.63 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (10.8) EER
Cooling Capacity	5200 BTU/hr (5190 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (5,200) BTU/hr
Remote Control	Without Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	2 (1.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Description	Sized For Studio Apartments Or Large Workshops, The 5200-btu/h Panasonic Standard Air Conditioner Offers Low-noise Operation And High Energy Efficiency. A Window-mount Unit, It Includes Two Cooling Levels And Two Fan Speeds, Plus A Dial Thermostat With Nine Settings, Making It Effective For Up To 150 Square Feet. The Wide Air Discharge Helps Distribute Cool Air Efficiently, While A Two-way Deflector Allows You To Direct The Flow Where You Want It. This Model Also Combats Humidity, Removing Up To 1.4 Pints Of Water Per Hour, And Operates Without Cooling As A Simple Fan.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	1.4 Pt/h (3.15 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (1.4) Pt/h
Air Flow	140 CFM (221.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (140) CFM
Filter	Reusable

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	480 (711.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (480)
Voltage	115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity	4.4 (13.8 lower than average)	vs	18.20

Dimensions
Width	18.56 in. (5.55 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	12.28 in. (94.69 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	14.5 in. (5.19 in. lower than average)	vs	19.69 in.