Kenmore 75080 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Kenmore 75080 8000 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 9.8 EER and a cooling capacity of 8,000 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Kenmore 75080 8000 BTU Air Conditioner uses much less cooling watts (21% less) on the other hand Kenmore 75080 8000 BTU Air Conditioner has far less air flow (42% less), a much less cooling capacity (27% less), and m

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Kenmore	vs	4.4% Air Conditioners have Kenmore	compare Kenmore Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	9.8 EER (0.37 EER lower than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (9.8) EER
Cooling Capacity	8000 BTU/hr (7990 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (8,000) BTU/hr
Dehumidifier	With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	96% Air Conditioners have With Dehumidifier Functionality
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	2 (1.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Description	Powerful Room Air Conditioner With Electronic Controls And Display, Electronic Thermostat And A Remote Control, Timer (delay, 1/3/6/10 Hours, On/off). 2 Cooling Speeds, 2 Fan-only Speeds.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Not Compliant	vs	41% Air Conditioners have Not Compliant
Moisture Removal	2.21 Pt/h (2.34 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (2.21) Pt/h
Air Flow	210 CFM (151.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (210) CFM
Swing Louvers	Up / Down · Left / Right
Filter	Reusable

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	820 (371.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (820)
Voltage	115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity	7.6 (10.6 lower than average)	vs	18.20

Dimensions
Width	19.56 in. (4.55 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	12.38 in. (94.59 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	19.38 in. (0.31 in. lower than average)	vs	19.69 in.