Friedrich X-Star XQ08L10 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Friedrich X-Star XQ08L10 8000 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 10.8 EER and a cooling capacity of 8,000 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Friedrich X-Star XQ08L10 8000 BTU Air Conditioner uses much less cooling watts (28% less), and has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (6% more) on the other hand Friedrich X-Star XQ08L10 8000 BTU Air Conditio

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Friedrich	vs	17.7% Air Conditioners have Friedrich	compare Friedrich Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	10.8 EER (0.63 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (10.8) EER
Cooling Capacity	8000 BTU/hr (7990 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (8,000) BTU/hr
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Description	Friedrich's X-star Line Of Cool-only Portable Window Air Conditioners Features Programmable Electronic Controls And One-touch Cooling. You Will Love The Ultimate Convenience Of Remote Control Operation. And, A 24-hour Programmable Timer Allows You To Present Cooling Levels So That You Do Not Waste Money Cooling Your Home When You Are Away. Some Models Are Energy Star Compliant And All Models Feature The Moneysaver Option. Each Model Has Three Cooling Speeds Plus A Fan Only Setting, Stale Air Exhaust Vents, Slide-out Chassis And Eight-way Air Flow Control.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	1.9 Pt/h (2.65 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (1.9) Pt/h
Air Flow	175 CFM (186.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (175) CFM
Filter	Reusable

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	741 (450.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (741)
Voltage	115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity	6.8 (11.4 lower than average)	vs	18.20

Dimensions
Width	19.75 in. (4.36 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	14 in. (92.97 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	21.38 in. (1.69 in. higher than average)	vs	19.69 in.