Friedrich EQ08M11 7500 BTU Air Conditioner

Friedrich EQ08M11 7500 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 10.7 EER and a cooling capacity of 7,500 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Friedrich EQ08M11 7500 BTU Air Conditioner uses much less cooling watts (32% less), and has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (5% more) on the other hand Friedrich EQ08M11 7500 BTU Air Conditioner has far le

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Friedrich	vs	17.7% Air Conditioners have Friedrich	compare Friedrich Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	10.7 EER (0.53 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (10.7) EER
Cooling Capacity	7500 BTU/hr (7490 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (7,500) BTU/hr
Remote Control	Without Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	2 (1.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Additional Features	Programmable Timer
Description	Keep Spaces Up To 350 Square Feet Comfortable Year-round Using This Friedrich Window Air Conditioner With Electric Heat. Featuring Easy-to-adjust Manual Controls And A Convenient Slide-out Chassis- This Window Ac Delivers 7-500 Btus Of Cooling Power And 4-000 Btus Of Heat. Additionally- This Lightweight Friedrich Air Conditioner Removes Up To 45.6 Pints Of Excess Moisture From Your Environment Each Day And Includes Friedrichs Innovative Comfortwatch Technology To Ensure That Your Entire Space Maintains Your Ideal Temperature.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Not Compliant	vs	41% Air Conditioners have Not Compliant
Moisture Removal	1.9 Pt/h (2.65 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (1.9) Pt/h
Air Flow	175 CFM (186.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (175) CFM
Swing Louvers	8-way
Filter	Reusable

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	701 (490.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (701)
Voltage	150 (1.54 higher than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity	6.9 (11.3 lower than average)	vs	18.20
Heating Watts	1290 (1288 higher than average)	vs	2,307	Compare similar Heating Watts (1290)
Heating Ampacity	11.2 (0.84 lower than average)	vs	12.04

Dimensions
Width	19.75 in. (4.36 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	14 in. (92.97 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	21.38 in. (1.69 in. higher than average)	vs	19.69 in.