Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Whynter ARC-13S 13000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	OceanAire ArcticAire 6034 Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Whynter ARC-13S 13000 BTU Air Conditioner and OceanAire ArcticAire 6034 Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warranty

There are 20 differences and 2 similarities between Whynter ARC-13S 13000 BTU Air Conditioner, OceanAire ArcticAire 6034 Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Whynter	vs	Oceanaire
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Portable	vs	Portable
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		11.06 EER	vs	10.2 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		13,000 BTU/hr	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier		With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features		Single Zone · Programmable Timer	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		The Whynter Sno Arctica Arc-13s Portable Air Conditioner Features The Highest Eer Of All Portable Room Air Conditioners In Its Class - An Amazing 11.06 Eer. The Innovative Engineering And Design Of The Arc-13s Gives It The Smallest Profile Of Any High Output Portable Air Conditioner. You Can Display This Stylish Unit On A Countertop Or Have It Situated Discretely Behind Your Sofa Or Under A Table. This Represents The Best In Next Generation Air Comfort Products.	vs	Great For Larger Server Rooms, Production Areas, Emergency Cooling And People Cooling. Fully Self Contained, Just Plug It In, Set The Thermostat To Your Desired Temperature, Add Any Required Accessories And Feel The Temperature Come Down.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Not Compliant	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		1.79 Pt/h	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		21 CFM	vs	3,000 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Filter		Reusable	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”
Cooling Operating Range			vs	From 55 F
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Operating Range”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		1175	vs	5,900
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		10.21	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”