Whynter ARC-13S 13000 BTU Air Conditioner

Whynter ARC-13S 13000 BTU Air Conditioner is a Portable air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 11.06 EER and a cooling capacity of 13,000 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Whynter ARC-13S 13000 BTU Air Conditioner has a much more cooling capacity (18% more), and moderately more energy efficiency rating (9% more) on the other hand Whynter ARC-13S 13000 BTU Air Conditioner has far less a

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Whynter	vs	0.7% Air Conditioners have Whynter	compare Whynter Air Conditioners
Type	Portable			compare Portable Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	11.06 EER (0.89 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (11.06) EER
Cooling Capacity	13000 BTU/hr (12990 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (13,000) BTU/hr
Dehumidifier	With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	96% Air Conditioners have With Dehumidifier Functionality
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Additional Features	Single Zone · Programmable Timer
Description	The Whynter Sno Arctica Arc-13s Portable Air Conditioner Features The Highest Eer Of All Portable Room Air Conditioners In Its Class - An Amazing 11.06 Eer. The Innovative Engineering And Design Of The Arc-13s Gives It The Smallest Profile Of Any High Output Portable Air Conditioner. You Can Display This Stylish Unit On A Countertop Or Have It Situated Discretely Behind Your Sofa Or Under A Table. This Represents The Best In Next Generation Air Comfort Products.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Not Compliant	vs	41% Air Conditioners have Not Compliant
Moisture Removal	1.79 Pt/h (2.76 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (1.79) Pt/h
Air Flow	21 CFM (340.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (21) CFM
Filter	Reusable

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	1175 (16.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (1175)
Voltage	115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity	10.21 (7.99 lower than average)	vs	18.20

Dimensions
Width	20.5 in. (3.61 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	19 in. (87.97 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	21.7 in. (2.01 in. higher than average)	vs	19.69 in.