Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Whynter SNO ARC-13W 13000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Whynter ARC-13S 13000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Whynter SNO ARC-13W 13000 BTU Air Conditioner and Whynter ARC-13S 13000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warra

There are 6 differences and 17 similarities between Whynter SNO ARC-13W 13000 BTU Air Conditioner, Whynter ARC-13S 13000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Whynter	vs	Whynter
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Portable	vs	Portable
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		11.06 EER	vs	11.06 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		13,000 BTU/hr	vs	13,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier		With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	With Dehumidifier Functionality
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features			vs	Single Zone · Programmable Timer
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		These Portable Units Are Extremely Mobile And Can Be Easily Setup In Almost Any Indoor Location And Are Most Commonly Used In Computer / Server Rooms, Bedrooms, Classrooms And Garages / Workshops.	vs	The Whynter Sno Arctica Arc-13s Portable Air Conditioner Features The Highest Eer Of All Portable Room Air Conditioners In Its Class - An Amazing 11.06 Eer. The Innovative Engineering And Design Of The Arc-13s Gives It The Smallest Profile Of Any High Output Portable Air Conditioner. You Can Display This Stylish Unit On A Countertop Or Have It Situated Discretely Behind Your Sofa Or Under A Table. This Represents The Best In Next Generation Air Comfort Products.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR			vs	Not Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		1.79 Pt/h	vs	1.79 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		21 CFM	vs	21 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Filter		Reusable	vs	Reusable
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”
Cooling Operating Range		From 64 F	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Operating Range”
Heating Operating Range		Up To 86 F	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Heating Operating Range”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		1175	vs	1175
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	115
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		10.21	vs	10.21
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		20.5 in.	vs	20.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		19 in.	vs	19 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		21.7 in.	vs	21.7 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”