Friedrich XQ08M10 9200 BTU Air Conditioner

Friedrich XQ08M10 9200 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 10.7 EER and a cooling capacity of 9,200 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Friedrich XQ08M10 9200 BTU Air Conditioner uses much less cooling watts (32% less), and has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (5% more) on the other hand Friedrich XQ08M10 9200 BTU Air Conditioner has far le

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Friedrich	vs	17.7% Air Conditioners have Friedrich	compare Friedrich Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	10.7 EER (0.53 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (10.7) EER
Cooling Capacity	9200 BTU/hr (9190 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (9,200) BTU/hr
Dehumidifier	With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	96% Air Conditioners have With Dehumidifier Functionality
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	2 (1.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Description	7500 Btu, Energy Efficient, Programmable, Commercial Grade Quality Window Air Conditioner With Remote. Washable Antimicrobial Filter For Protection Against Fungal And Bacterial Growth. At 14 In. In Height, 19-3/4 In. In Width, And 21-3/8 In. In Depth, This Unit Can Be Installed In Windows With A Minimum Of 22 In. In Width (with One Side Curtain Installed). Its Maximum Coverage Area Is 325 Sq. Ft.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	2 Pt/h (2.55 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (2) Pt/h
Air Flow	175 CFM (186.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (175) CFM
Swing Louvers	8-way
Filter	Rigid/slide-out

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	701 (490.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (701)
Voltage	115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46
Heating Watts	850 (848 higher than average)	vs	2,307	Compare similar Heating Watts (850)

Dimensions
Width	22.62 in. (1.49 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	15.38 in. (91.59 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	24 in. (4.31 in. higher than average)	vs	19.69 in.