Friedrich CP10E10 9800 BTU Air Conditioner

Friedrich CP10E10 9800 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 10.8 EER and a cooling capacity of 9,800 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Friedrich CP10E10 9800 BTU Air Conditioner uses moderately less cooling watts (11% less), and has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (6% more) on the other hand Friedrich CP10E10 9800 BTU Air Conditioner has

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Friedrich	vs	17.7% Air Conditioners have Friedrich	compare Friedrich Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	10.8 EER (0.63 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (10.8) EER
Cooling Capacity	9800 BTU/hr (9790 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (9,800) BTU/hr
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Description	This 9, 800-btu Window Ac Unit Comfortably Cools A Space Measuring Up To 450 Sq. Ft. Top Features Include A 12-hour Programmable Timer, 3 Cooling Speeds, 3 Fan-only Settings, And 4-way Airflow Control. Specialized Air Sweep Louvers Help Promote Even Air Distribution To Maximize Comfort.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	3.3 Pt/h (1.25 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (3.3) Pt/h
Air Flow	270 CFM (91.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (270) CFM
Swing Louvers	Auto-swing
Filter	Triple-filter · Rigid/slide-out

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	920 (271.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (920)
Voltage	115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity	8.5 (9.7 lower than average)	vs	18.20

Dimensions
Width	23.63 in. (0.48 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	15 in. (91.97 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	22.25 in. (2.56 in. higher than average)	vs	19.69 in.