Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Sharp AF-S80MX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner and Sharp AF-S80MX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warranty and

There are 11 differences and 10 similarities between Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner, Sharp AF-S80MX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Sharp	vs	Sharp
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		10.7 EER	vs	10.8 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		6,000 BTU/hr	vs	8,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features		Single Zone · Programmable Timer	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		Energy Star Rated 6-000 Btu Window Air Conditioner With Remote- User Friendly Controls- Washable Filter- 4-way Air Direction And Many More Features.	vs	Sharp’s Air Conditioners Not Only Exceed Federal Efficiency Standards, They Exceed Design Standards As Well. Sleek And Stylish, They Will Fit Into Your Home Design Beautifully. Saving You Energy And Enhancing Your Decor, Sharp’s Air Conditioner Line Is Too Cool To Pass Up.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Compliant	vs	Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		1.3 Pt/h	vs	2 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		176 CFM	vs	220 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers		4-way	vs	Up / Down · Left / Right
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Reusable	vs	Reusable
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		560	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	115
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		5.5	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		18.5 in.	vs	18.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		12.5 in.	vs	12.59 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		16.3 in.	vs	13.94 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”