Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	LG LP6011ER 6000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Sharp AF-S80MX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of LG LP6011ER 6000 BTU Air Conditioner and Sharp AF-S80MX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warranty and mor

There are 11 differences and 10 similarities between LG LP6011ER 6000 BTU Air Conditioner, Sharp AF-S80MX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Lg	vs	Sharp
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		10.7 EER	vs	10.8 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		6,000 BTU/hr	vs	8,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier		With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features		Programmable Timer	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		The Lg Electronics Lp6011er 6, 000 Btu Low Profile Energy Star Window Air Conditioner With Remote Control Is Perfect For Small Rooms Or Rooms Where Supplemental Cooling Is Needed. This Unit Has An Lcd Remote Control And Energy Saver Function. It Includes 3 Fan Speeds For Cooling And 3 Speeds For Fan Only, Top Air Discharge, And Outdoor Vent Exhaust. And With A 10.7 Energy Efficiency Ratio This Unit Provides Savings Along With Cool, Quiet Comfort.	vs	Sharp’s Air Conditioners Not Only Exceed Federal Efficiency Standards, They Exceed Design Standards As Well. Sleek And Stylish, They Will Fit Into Your Home Design Beautifully. Saving You Energy And Enhancing Your Decor, Sharp’s Air Conditioner Line Is Too Cool To Pass Up.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Compliant	vs	Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		1.7 Pt/h	vs	2 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		212 CFM	vs	220 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers		4-way	vs	Up / Down · Left / Right
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Reusable	vs	Reusable
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		560	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	115
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”

Dimensions
Width		20.88 in.	vs	18.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		12 in.	vs	12.59 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		18.03 in.	vs	13.94 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”