Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	GE AJCQ08ACD 8350 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Friedrich YS10M10 9500 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of GE AJCQ08ACD 8350 BTU Air Conditioner and Friedrich YS10M10 9500 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warranty and

There are 10 differences and 11 similarities between GE AJCQ08ACD 8350 BTU Air Conditioner, Friedrich YS10M10 9500 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Ge	vs	Friedrich
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		9.5 EER	vs	11.7 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		8,350 BTU/hr	vs	9,500 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier			vs	No Dehumidifier Functionality
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Description		This Ge Built-in Room Air Cool Unit Comes With An Electronic Digital Thermostat, Electronic Controls With Remote And Is Energy Star Qualified. For Your Convenience It Comes With A 24 Hr. Timer.	vs	The Friedrich Ys10m10 9, 500-btu Cooling Capacity And 7500-btu Heating Capacity Window Air Conditioner With Heat Pump Is Part Of Friedrich's Kühl Programmable Ultra Premium Cooling Line, Which Includes Energy Star® Qualified Units Designed With Commercial Grade Durability For Home Or Commercial Use. With A Host Of Intuitive Features And Flexible Installation Options, The Ys10m10 Provides Comfortable And Even Cooling For Spaces Sized Up To 425 Sq. Ft. And Heating Up To 325 Sq. Ft. 9500 Btu, Ultra Premium, Energy Star Qualified, Programmable, Window Air Conditioner With Heat Pump Has Superior Sound Reduction Technology And Digital Lcd Remote. Washable Antimicrobial Filter For Protection Against Fungal And Bacterial Growth.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Compliant	vs	Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		2 Pt/h	vs	1.9 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		297 CFM	vs	285 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Filter		Rigid/slide-out	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		880	vs	812
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	115
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		8	vs	7.8
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”
Heating Watts			vs	743
	[X] Add Comment about “Heating Watts”
Heating Ampacity			vs	7.6
	[X] Add Comment about “Heating Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		26 in.	vs	25.94 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		15.63 in.	vs	15.94 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		16.88 in.	vs	29 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”