Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Frigidaire FRA084KT7 8000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Sharp AF-S80MX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Frigidaire FRA084KT7 8000 BTU Air Conditioner and Sharp AF-S80MX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warrant

There are 13 differences and 7 similarities between Frigidaire FRA084KT7 8000 BTU Air Conditioner, Sharp AF-S80MX 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Frigidaire	vs	Sharp
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		10.5 EER	vs	10.8 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		8,000 BTU/hr	vs	8,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier		With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Description		Frigidaire's Fra084kt7 8, 000 Btu Window-mounted Slider/casement Air Conditioner Is Perfect For Medium To Large Size Rooms Up To 350 Square Feet. This Unit Features 3 Different Fan Speeds For More Cooling Flexibility, Electronic Controls And Full Function Remote Control That Allows You To Precisely Control The Temperature And Fan Seed From Across The Room. The Antimicrobial Filter Reduces Bacteria, Room Odors, And Other Airborne Particles For A Comfortable Environment. And With Energy Star Efficiency, This Unit Provides Savings Along With Cool, Quiet Comfort.	vs	Sharp’s Air Conditioners Not Only Exceed Federal Efficiency Standards, They Exceed Design Standards As Well. Sleek And Stylish, They Will Fit Into Your Home Design Beautifully. Saving You Energy And Enhancing Your Decor, Sharp’s Air Conditioner Line Is Too Cool To Pass Up.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Compliant	vs	Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		3 Pt/h	vs	2 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		263 CFM	vs	220 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers			vs	Up / Down · Left / Right
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Rigid/slide-out	vs	Reusable
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		760	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	115
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”

Dimensions
Width		14.19 in.	vs	18.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		20.25 in.	vs	12.59 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		23 in.	vs	13.94 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”