Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Friedrich XQ08M10 9200 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Sunpentown International WA-8291S 8200 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Friedrich XQ08M10 9200 BTU Air Conditioner and Sunpentown International WA-8291S 8200 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, coolin

There are 13 differences and 11 similarities between Friedrich XQ08M10 9200 BTU Air Conditioner, Sunpentown International WA-8291S 8200 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Friedrich	vs	Sunpentown
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		10.7 EER	vs	10.8 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		9,200 BTU/hr	vs	8,200 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier		With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		2	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Description		7500 Btu, Energy Efficient, Programmable, Commercial Grade Quality Window Air Conditioner With Remote. Washable Antimicrobial Filter For Protection Against Fungal And Bacterial Growth. At 14 In. In Height, 19-3/4 In. In Width, And 21-3/8 In. In Depth, This Unit Can Be Installed In Windows With A Minimum Of 22 In. In Width (with One Side Curtain Installed). Its Maximum Coverage Area Is 325 Sq. Ft.	vs	Keep Your Bedroom, Small Apartment, Or Any Space Up To 200 Square Feet Comfortably Cool Using This Energy-efficient Window Air Conditioner. The Sunpentown Wa-6011s Window Air Conditioner Features Affordable Installation With The Window Kit That Comes Standard With The Air Conditioner. Key Features Of This Energy Star-rated Air Conditioner Include Directional Airflow, A Remote Control, And A Programmable Sleep Timer.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Compliant	vs	Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		2 Pt/h	vs	2.3 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		175 CFM	vs	177 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers		8-way	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Rigid/slide-out	vs	Reusable
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”
Cooling Operating Range			vs	64 - 88 F
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Operating Range”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		701	vs	759
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	115
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity			vs	6.8
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”
Heating Watts		850	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Heating Watts”

Dimensions
Width		22.62 in.	vs	19.7 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		15.38 in.	vs	15 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		24 in.	vs	18.7 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”