Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Amana PTH093B35AJ 9100 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Soleus KFR-18GW 18000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Amana PTH093B35AJ 9100 BTU Air Conditioner and Soleus KFR-18GW 18000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warranty

There are 22 differences and 4 similarities between Amana PTH093B35AJ 9100 BTU Air Conditioner, Soleus KFR-18GW 18000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Amana	vs	Soleus
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Split System	vs	Split System
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		11.5 EER	vs	9.9 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		9,100 BTU/hr	vs	18,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier			vs	With Dehumidifier Functionality
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		Without Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)			vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features			vs	Ductless
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description			vs	Split Air Conditioners Are Perfect For Those That Do Not Have Central Air Conditioning, And Do Not Want To Settle For The Noise And Inefficiency Of Window Units. Split Systems Offer Higher Efficiency And Reduced Noise Without A Large Hole In The Wall Or An Open Window. By Separating The Compressor And Condenser Coil From The Fan And Evaporator Coil, The Noisiest Component Is Away From The Room. The Indoor Unit Will Usually Have Remote Control Capabilities And A Timer To Cycle The System Only When Needed. Since Mini Splits Have No Ducts, They Avoid The Energy Losses Associated With Ductwork Of Central Forced Air Systems. Duct Losses Can Account For A Significant Portion Of Energy Consumption For Space Conditioning, Especially If The Ducts Are In A Unconditioned Space Such As An Attic.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		vs	Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		vs	3.1 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		vs	900 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers		vs	Up / Down
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		vs	Reusable
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”
Cooling Operating Range		vs	60 - 109 F
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Operating Range”
Heating Operating Range		vs	28 - 75 F
	[X] Add Comment about “Heating Operating Range”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		790	vs	1870
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		230	vs	208 / 230
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity			vs	8.1
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”
Heating Watts		750	vs	1890
	[X] Add Comment about “Heating Watts”
Heating Ampacity			vs	8.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Heating Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		42 in.	vs	42 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		16 in.	vs	14 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		14 in.	vs	11 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”