Soleus KFR-18GW 18000 BTU Air Conditioner

Soleus KFR-18GW 18000 BTU Air Conditioner is a Split System air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 9.9 EER and a cooling capacity of 18,000 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Soleus KFR-18GW 18000 BTU Air Conditioner has far more air flow (149% more), and a far more cooling capacity (64% more) on the other hand Soleus KFR-18GW 18000 BTU Air Conditioner has a moderately less energy efficie

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Soleus	vs	4.8% Air Conditioners have Soleus	compare Soleus Air Conditioners
Type	Split System			compare Split System Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	9.9 EER (0.27 EER lower than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (9.9) EER
Cooling Capacity	18000 BTU/hr (17990 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (18,000) BTU/hr
Dehumidifier	With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	96% Air Conditioners have With Dehumidifier Functionality
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Additional Features	Ductless
Description	Split Air Conditioners Are Perfect For Those That Do Not Have Central Air Conditioning, And Do Not Want To Settle For The Noise And Inefficiency Of Window Units. Split Systems Offer Higher Efficiency And Reduced Noise Without A Large Hole In The Wall Or An Open Window. By Separating The Compressor And Condenser Coil From The Fan And Evaporator Coil, The Noisiest Component Is Away From The Room. The Indoor Unit Will Usually Have Remote Control Capabilities And A Timer To Cycle The System Only When Needed. Since Mini Splits Have No Ducts, They Avoid The Energy Losses Associated With Ductwork Of Central Forced Air Systems. Duct Losses Can Account For A Significant Portion Of Energy Consumption For Space Conditioning, Especially If The Ducts Are In A Unconditioned Space Such As An Attic.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	3.1 Pt/h (1.45 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (3.1) Pt/h
Air Flow	900 CFM (538.75 CFM higher than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (900) CFM
Swing Louvers	Up / Down
Filter	Reusable
Cooling Operating Range	60 - 109 F
Heating Operating Range	28 - 75 F

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	1870 (678.92 higher than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (1870)
Voltage	208 / 230
Cooling Ampacity	8.1 (10.1 lower than average)	vs	18.20
Heating Watts	1890 (1888 higher than average)	vs	2,307	Compare similar Heating Watts (1890)
Heating Ampacity	8.2 (3.84 lower than average)	vs	12.04

Dimensions
Width	42 in. (17.89 in. higher than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	14 in. (92.97 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	11 in. (8.69 in. lower than average)	vs	19.69 in.