Frigidaire FRA065AT7 6000 BTU Air Conditioner

Frigidaire FRA065AT7 6000 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 10.7 EER and a cooling capacity of 6,000 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Frigidaire FRA065AT7 6000 BTU Air Conditioner uses far less cooling watts (46% less), and has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (5% more) on the other hand Frigidaire FRA065AT7 6000 BTU Air Conditioner has f

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Frigidaire	vs	11.7% Air Conditioners have Frigidaire	compare Frigidaire Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	10.7 EER (0.53 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (10.7) EER
Cooling Capacity	6000 BTU/hr (5990 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (6,000) BTU/hr
Dehumidifier	With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	96% Air Conditioners have With Dehumidifier Functionality
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Description	Frigidaire's Fra065at7 6, 000 Btu Mini Compact Window Air Conditioner Is Perfect For Small To Medium Size Rooms Up To 216-square Feet. This Unit Features Electronic Controls And Full Function Remote Control. The Antimicrobial Filter Reduces Bacteria, Room Odors, And Other Airborne Particles For A Comfortable Environment. And With Energy Star Efficiency, This Unit Provides Savings Along With Cool, Quiet Comfort.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	1.3 Pt/h (3.25 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (1.3) Pt/h
Air Flow	176 CFM (185.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (176) CFM
Swing Louvers	8-way

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	560 (631.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (560)
Voltage	115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity	5.4 (12.8 lower than average)	vs	18.20

Dimensions
Width	22 in. (2.11 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	14.7 in. (92.27 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	18.5 in. (1.19 in. lower than average)	vs	19.69 in.