Frigidaire FAA065P7A 6000 BTU Air Conditioner

Frigidaire FAA065P7A 6000 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 10.7 EER and a cooling capacity of 6,000 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Frigidaire FAA065P7A 6000 BTU Air Conditioner uses far less cooling watts (46% less), and has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (5% more) on the other hand Frigidaire FAA065P7A 6000 BTU Air Conditioner has f

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Frigidaire	vs	11.7% Air Conditioners have Frigidaire	compare Frigidaire Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	10.7 EER (0.53 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (10.7) EER
Cooling Capacity	6000 BTU/hr (5990 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (6,000) BTU/hr
Dehumidifier	With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	96% Air Conditioners have With Dehumidifier Functionality
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Description	This Unit Features A High Energy Efficiency Ratio Of 10.7, Electronic Controls With Remote Control, And Ionizer/electrostatic Clean Air Filtration Which Is Relief For Increasing Numbers Of Allergy And Respiratory Ailment Sufferers. Negative Ion Generators And Electrostatic Filter Elements Are Used For Air Cleaning Performance That Is Substantially Higher Than Conventional Filter Methods. So When You Are Looking For A A Unit Which Will Clean The Air As Well As Cool The Room You Found The One.

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	1.7 Pt/h (2.85 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (1.7) Pt/h
Air Flow	170 CFM (191.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (170) CFM
Swing Louvers	Up / Down · Left / Right

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	560 (631.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (560)
Voltage	115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity	5.2 (13 lower than average)	vs	18.20

Dimensions
Width	18.5 in. (5.61 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	12.5 in. (94.47 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	14 in. (5.69 in. lower than average)	vs	19.69 in.