Friedrich XQ05M10 5500 BTU Air Conditioner

Friedrich XQ05M10 5500 BTU Air Conditioner is a Thru-Wall/Window air conditioner which has an energy efficiency rating of 11.2 EER and a cooling capacity of 5,500 BTU/hr.
Compared to all other air conditioners Friedrich XQ05M10 5500 BTU Air Conditioner uses far less cooling watts (53% less), and has a moderately more energy efficiency rating (10% more) on the other hand Friedrich XQ05M10 5500 BTU Air Conditioner has far le

Compare with other Air Conditioners
Compare

All other Air Conditioners

Key Features
Brand	Friedrich	vs	17.7% Air Conditioners have Friedrich	compare Friedrich Air Conditioners
Type	Thru-wall/window			compare Thru-Wall/Window Air Conditioners
Energy Efficiency Rating	11.2 EER (1.03 EER higher than average)	vs	10.17 EER	Compare similar Energy Efficiency Rating (11.2) EER
Cooling Capacity	5500 BTU/hr (5490 BTU/hr higher than average)	vs	10,996 BTU/hr	Compare similar Cooling Capacity (5,500) BTU/hr
Remote Control	With Remote Control
Fan Speeds (Cooling)	3 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	3.61
Additional Features	Programmable Timer
Description	The X Star Line Is Their Compact Premium Line Of Commercial Grade Room Air Conditioners. Xq Is Programmable With Remote. Features Include A 24 Hour Timer Auto-adjusting Smart Fan And A Money Saver Setting That Reduces Energy Usage And Saves Money. (features Not Available On All Models).

Other Features
ENERGY STAR	Compliant	vs	59% Air Conditioners have Compliant
Moisture Removal	1 Pt/h (3.55 Pt/h lower than average)	vs	4.55 Pt/h	Compare similar Moisture Removal (1) Pt/h
Air Flow	170 CFM (191.25 CFM lower than average)	vs	361.25 CFM	Compare similar Air Flow (170) CFM
Swing Louvers	8-way
Filter	Reusable

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts	491 (700.08 lower than average)	vs	1191.08	Compare similar Cooling Watts (491)
Voltage	115 (33.46 lower than average)	vs	148.46
Cooling Ampacity	4.5 (13.7 lower than average)	vs	18.20

Dimensions
Width	19.75 in. (4.36 in. lower than average)	vs	24.11 in.
Height	14 in. (92.97 in. lower than average)	vs	106.97 in.
Depth	21.38 in. (1.69 in. higher than average)	vs	19.69 in.