Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Soleus SG-TTW-09ESE-26 9200 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Friedrich SS10M10 9500 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Soleus SG-TTW-09ESE-26 9200 BTU Air Conditioner and Friedrich SS10M10 9500 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, wa

There are 9 differences and 11 similarities between Soleus SG-TTW-09ESE-26 9200 BTU Air Conditioner, Friedrich SS10M10 9500 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Soleus	vs	Friedrich
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		9.8 EER	vs	11.2 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		9,200 BTU/hr	vs	9,500 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier		With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	No Dehumidifier Functionality
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		4	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features		Programmable Timer	vs	Programmable Timer
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		Air Conditioner - Soleus Through The Wall Air Conditioner - Sg-ttw-09ese-26the Soleus Through The Wall Air Conditioner Sg-ttw-09ese-26 Is An Energy Star Rated, Environmentally Friendly, Energy Efficient 9, 000 Btu Air Conditioner That Provides Increased Efficiency And Reliabilty With An Energy Saving / Sleep Mode That Cuts Down On Electricity Consumption.	vs	The Friedrich Ss10m10 9, 500-btu Window Air Conditioner Is Part Of Friedrich's Kuhl Programmable Ultra Premium Cooling Line, Which Includes Energy Star Qualified Units Designed With Commercial Grade Durability For Home Or Commercial Use. With A Host Of Intuitive Features And Flexible Installation Options, The Ss10m10 Provides Comfortable And Even Cooling For Spaces Sized Up To 425 Sq. Ft.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Compliant	vs	Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		60 Pt/h	vs	2 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		283 CFM	vs	260 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Filter		Reusable	vs	Reusable · Rigid/slide-out
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		940	vs	792
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	115
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity			vs	7.7
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		26 in.	vs	25.94 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		15.63 in.	vs	15.94 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		21.13 in.	vs	29 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”