Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Kenmore 72059 5700 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner and Kenmore 72059 5700 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warranty and m

There are 12 differences and 10 similarities between Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner, Kenmore 72059 5700 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Sharp	vs	Kenmore
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		10.7 EER	vs	11.2 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		6,000 BTU/hr	vs	5,700 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features		Single Zone · Programmable Timer	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		Energy Star Rated 6-000 Btu Window Air Conditioner With Remote- User Friendly Controls- Washable Filter- 4-way Air Direction And Many More Features.	vs	Cool Off This Summer With This Kenmore Room Air Conditioner. Includes A Quick Mount Window Kit For Easy Installation. Ez-out Reusable Air Filters. Pleated Kit To Fit Any Window. Electronic Controls For Easy Setting. 4-way Adjustable Air Direction Control.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Compliant	vs	Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		1.3 Pt/h	vs	1.58 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		176 CFM	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers		4-way	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Reusable	vs	Reusable
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		560	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		5.5	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		18.5 in.	vs	18.56 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		12.5 in.	vs	12.28 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		16.3 in.	vs	14.56 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”