Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Friedrich US08C10 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner and Friedrich US08C10 8000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warranty a

There are 14 differences and 7 similarities between Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner, Friedrich US08C10 8000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Sharp	vs	Friedrich
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		10.7 EER	vs	9.6 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		6,000 BTU/hr	vs	8,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features		Single Zone · Programmable Timer	vs	Programmable Timer
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		Energy Star Rated 6-000 Btu Window Air Conditioner With Remote- User Friendly Controls- Washable Filter- 4-way Air Direction And Many More Features.	vs	Friedrich's Uni-fit Cooling Thru The Wall 8000 Btu Air Conditioner Features A Universal Fit For Easy Replacement. Fits Most Major Brand Sleeves. An Environmentally Friendly R-410a Refrigerant Is Used. The Air Conditioner Has Programmable Controls With 12-hour Timer That Lets You Program On/off Times. It Also Features Three Cooling Speeds, Plus Fan Only Setting. And A Six-way Air Flow Control. The Seacoast Protection For Added Durability In Coastal Climates. There Is Even A Slide-out Chassis, Permanent Filter, And Auto Re-start Feature.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Compliant	vs	Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		1.3 Pt/h	vs	2 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		176 CFM	vs	260 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers		4-way	vs	6-way
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Reusable	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		560	vs	115
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	125
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		5.5	vs	15
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		18.5 in.	vs	24 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		12.5 in.	vs	14.38 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		16.3 in.	vs	20.13 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”