Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Danby DPAC5070 5000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner and Danby DPAC5070 5000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warranty and

There are 20 differences and 1 similarities between Sharp AF-S60RX 6000 BTU Air Conditioner, Danby DPAC5070 5000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Sharp	vs	Danby
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Portable
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		10.7 EER	vs	9.2 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		6,000 BTU/hr	vs	5,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features		Single Zone · Programmable Timer	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		Energy Star Rated 6-000 Btu Window Air Conditioner With Remote- User Friendly Controls- Washable Filter- 4-way Air Direction And Many More Features.	vs	Danby Is One Of The Largest Household Appliance Marketing Companies In North America With An Impressive Lineup Of Compact Specialty And Home Comfort Appliances To Suit The Lifestyles Of Todays Consumer.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Compliant	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		1.3 Pt/h	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		176 CFM	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers		4-way	vs	2-way
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Reusable	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		560	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		5.5	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		18.5 in.	vs	17.13 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		12.5 in.	vs	29 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		16.3 in.	vs	13.19 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”