Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Royal Sovereign ARP-900E 9000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Windchaser PAC9 9000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Royal Sovereign ARP-900E 9000 BTU Air Conditioner and Windchaser PAC9 9000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, wa

There are 13 differences and 9 similarities between Royal Sovereign ARP-900E 9000 BTU Air Conditioner, Windchaser PAC9 9000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Royal	vs	Windchaser
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Portable	vs	Portable
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		11 EER	vs	9.5 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		9,000 BTU/hr	vs	9,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	Without Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		2	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Description		Product Features: Type: Portable; Cooling Capacity: 10000 Btu/hr; Energy Efficiency Rating: 10.3 Eer; Energy Star: Not Compliant; Filter: Reusable; Moisture Removal: 2.32 Pt/h; Width: 16.69 In.; Height: 29.68 In.; Depth: 15.75 In.	vs	This Portable Air Conditoner Has Two Motors, One For The Condenser And One For The Evaporator Which Makes Me A Quieter Unit.condensation Is Distributed Over The Condenser. Keeps The Compressor Cooler And The Unit More Efficient.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR			vs	Not Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		1.58 Pt/h	vs	3.4 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		210 CFM	vs	188 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers		Up / Down · Left / Right	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Reusable	vs	Reusable
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”
Cooling Operating Range			vs	65 - 95 F
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Operating Range”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		680	vs	900
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	115
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		6.8	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		16 in.	vs	18.1 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		29 in.	vs	30.7 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		15 in.	vs	12.6 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”