Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Haier CPR09XC7 9000 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Amana PTH093E25CXXX 9000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Haier CPR09XC7 9000 BTU Air Conditioner and Amana PTH093E25CXXX 9000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warranty

There are 19 differences and 2 similarities between Haier CPR09XC7 9000 BTU Air Conditioner, Amana PTH093E25CXXX 9000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Haier	vs	Amana
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Portable	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		9.5 EER	vs	11.7 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		9,000 BTU/hr	vs	9,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier		With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	With Dehumidifier Functionality
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	Without Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Description		Cools And Dehumidifies A Small Room With Ease. Unit Is Self-evaporating So It Can Run All Night Without The Need To Empty Water. Ultra-compact, 24-hour On/off Timer, Electronic Controls With Remote.	vs	The Amana Pth093e25cxxx 9000 Btu Thru-wall/window Air Conditioner Has An Air Flow Of 310 Cfm (cubic Foot Per Meter).
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR			vs	Not Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal			vs	3 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		200 CFM	vs	310 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Filter			vs	Rigid/slide-out
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		950	vs	770
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		115	vs	230
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		8	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”
Heating Watts			vs	735
	[X] Add Comment about “Heating Watts”

Dimensions
Width		17.09 in.	vs	42 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		30.31 in.	vs	16.06 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		16.88 in.	vs	21.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”