Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Friedrich SM18M30 17500 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Fedders AZEY18F7A 18000 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Friedrich SM18M30 17500 BTU Air Conditioner and Fedders AZEY18F7A 18000 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warra

There are 12 differences and 10 similarities between Friedrich SM18M30 17500 BTU Air Conditioner, Fedders AZEY18F7A 18000 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Friedrich	vs	Fedders
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		10.7 EER	vs	9.7 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		17,500 BTU/hr	vs	18,000 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier		No Dehumidifier Functionality	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		With Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		4	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features		Programmable Timer	vs	Programmable Timer
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		Lower Your Room Temperature And Your Energy Costs With This Friedrich Window Air Conditioner. This Ac Effectively Delivers 17-500 Btus Of Cooling Power To Spaces Up To 950 Square Feet. Convenient Features Such As Comfortwatch Technology - A 7-day Programmable Thermostat- Automatic Temperature Adjustment- And A Remote Control Allow You To Keep Your Space Cool Without The Hassle. Plus- Pre-programmed Energy Saving Settings- Eco-friendly R-410a Refrigerant- And Durable Friedrich Construction Ensure That This Window Ac Was Designed Operate Efficiently For Years To Come.	vs	Fedders Window Air Conditioners Are Lightweight With A Compact Design That Fits In Most Windows To Provide Efficient Cooling.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Compliant	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		4.6 Pt/h	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		350 CFM	vs	460 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers		8-way	vs	4-way
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Reusable · Rigid/slide-out	vs	Rigid/slide-out
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		1635	vs	1900
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		208 / 230	vs	230
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity		8	vs	8.4
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”
Heating Ampacity			vs	22
	[X] Add Comment about “Heating Ampacity”

Dimensions
Width		25.94 in.	vs	23.63 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		17.94 in.	vs	17.19 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		29 in.	vs	25.5 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”