Home > Air Conditioners > Comparison

Compare	Friedrich PDH15K5 14500 BTU Air Conditioner	VS	Friedrich SM18M30 17500 BTU Air Conditioner

Add another Item to this comparison Add Item

Overview:

Detailed comparison of Friedrich PDH15K5 14500 BTU Air Conditioner and Friedrich SM18M30 17500 BTU Air Conditioner. Side by side look at similarities and differences for energy efficiency, cooling capacity, air flow, moisture removal, cooling watts, warra

There are 17 differences and 5 similarities between Friedrich PDH15K5 14500 BTU Air Conditioner, Friedrich SM18M30 17500 BTU Air Conditioner

Key Features
Brand		Friedrich	vs	Friedrich
	[X] Add Comment about “Brand”
Type		Thru-wall/window	vs	Thru-wall/window
	[X] Add Comment about “Type”
Energy Efficiency Rating		9.8 EER	vs	10.7 EER
	[X] Add Comment about “Energy Efficiency Rating”
Cooling Capacity		14,500 BTU/hr	vs	17,500 BTU/hr
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Capacity”
Dehumidifier		With Dehumidifier Functionality	vs	No Dehumidifier Functionality
	[X] Add Comment about “Dehumidifier”
Remote Control		Without Remote Control	vs	With Remote Control
	[X] Add Comment about “Remote Control”
Fan Speeds (Cooling)		3	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Fan Speeds (Cooling)”
Additional Features			vs	Programmable Timer
	[X] Add Comment about “Additional Features”
Description		The Friedrich Pdh15k5 14500 Btu Thru-wall/window Air Conditioner Has An Air Flow Of 75 Cfm (cubic Foot Per Meter).	vs	Lower Your Room Temperature And Your Energy Costs With This Friedrich Window Air Conditioner. This Ac Effectively Delivers 17-500 Btus Of Cooling Power To Spaces Up To 950 Square Feet. Convenient Features Such As Comfortwatch Technology - A 7-day Programmable Thermostat- Automatic Temperature Adjustment- And A Remote Control Allow You To Keep Your Space Cool Without The Hassle. Plus- Pre-programmed Energy Saving Settings- Eco-friendly R-410a Refrigerant- And Durable Friedrich Construction Ensure That This Window Ac Was Designed Operate Efficiently For Years To Come.
	[X] Add Comment about “Description”

Other Features
ENERGY STAR		Not Compliant	vs	Compliant
	[X] Add Comment about “ENERGY STAR”
Moisture Removal		3.2 Pt/h	vs	4.6 Pt/h
	[X] Add Comment about “Moisture Removal”
Air Flow		75 CFM	vs	350 CFM
	[X] Add Comment about “Air Flow”
Swing Louvers			vs	8-way
	[X] Add Comment about “Swing Louvers”
Filter		Reusable	vs	Reusable · Rigid/slide-out
	[X] Add Comment about “Filter”

Electrical Requirements
Cooling Watts		1480	vs	1635
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Watts”
Voltage		230	vs	208 / 230
	[X] Add Comment about “Voltage”
Cooling Ampacity			vs	8
	[X] Add Comment about “Cooling Ampacity”
Heating Watts		1300	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Heating Watts”

Dimensions
Width		42 in.	vs	25.94 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Width”
Height		16 in.	vs	17.94 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Height”
Depth		13.5 in.	vs	29 in.
	[X] Add Comment about “Depth”